[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250811104940.GF1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:49:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 m@/6] perf/core: Split out mlock limit handling
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:06:37AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> To prepare for splitting the buffer allocation out into seperate functions
> for the ring buffer and the AUX buffer, split out mlock limit handling into
> a helper function, which can be called from both.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>
> ---
Does this not also need this? I found this stray user_extra when I
eventually removed the local user_extra variable.
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6997,8 +6997,6 @@ static int perf_mmap(struct file *file,
if (vma_size != PAGE_SIZE * nr_pages)
return -EINVAL;
- user_extra = nr_pages;
-
mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
ret = -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists