[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5f2a6d5-d793-94f0-8d8c-5cc5b7d142b8@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:52:01 +0800
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: Song Gao <gaosong@...ngson.cn>, zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, lixianglai@...ngson.cn
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Use kvm_get_vcpu_by_id() instead of
kvm_get_vcpu()
On 2025/8/11 上午10:55, Song Gao wrote:
> Use kvm_get_vcpu() may can't get vcpu context, use kvm_get_vcpu_by_id()
> instead of kvm_get_vcpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaosong@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c | 5 ++++-
> arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/ipi.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> index a3a12af9ecbf..5180da91d2e6 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,10 @@ static void eiointc_update_irq(struct loongarch_eiointc *s, int irq, int level)
> }
>
> cpu = s->sw_coremap[irq];
> - vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(s->kvm, cpu);
> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(s->kvm, cpu);
> + if (unlikely(vcpu == NULL)) {
> + return;
> + }
Brace {} is unnecessary with kernel coding style :), just something like
this:
if (unlikely(vcpu == NULL))
return;
The other looks good to me.
Regards
Bibo Mao
> if (level) {
> /* if not enable return false */
> if (!test_bit(irq, (unsigned long *)s->enable.reg_u32))
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/ipi.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/ipi.c
> index e658d5b37c04..0348a83a7ed7 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/ipi.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/ipi.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int kvm_ipi_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
> cpu = (attr->attr >> 16) & 0x3ff;
> addr = attr->attr & 0xff;
>
> - vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(dev->kvm, cpu);
> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(dev->kvm, cpu);
> if (unlikely(vcpu == NULL)) {
> kvm_err("%s: invalid target cpu: %d\n", __func__, cpu);
> return -EINVAL;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists