[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AF48133C-BD57-4EEF-8E4A-ABEECB8A5C49@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:37:36 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] rust: irq: add support for non-threaded IRQs and
handlers
>> Also, I was getting tons of “unreachable_pub” warnings
>> otherwise, FYI.
>
> If you got unreachable_pub warnings, then you are missing re-exports.
>
> Alice
The re-exports are as-is in the current patch, did I miss anything? Because I
don’t think so.
In particular, should the irq module itself be private?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists