[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DC0HD39JC201.N1K8MVD1P7OI@cknow.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:23:55 +0200
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, "Piotr Zalewski"
<pZ010001011111@...ton.me>
Cc: <hjc@...k-chips.com>, <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rockchip/drm: vop2: make vp registers nonvolatile
Hi Heiko,
On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:46 PM CEST, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2025, 12:37:40 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Diederik de Haas:
>> On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:20 PM CEST, Piotr Zalewski wrote:
>> >> With a new version of a patch, you're supposed to add the tags you
>> >> received for previous versions, like my Tested-by tag [1].
>> >>
>> >> (unless the new version has changed so much you feel they should not be
>> >> carried over; you then need to explicitly describe that and why you
>> >> dropped them)
>> >
>> > Forgot... Should i send it as PATCH v2 RESEND?
>>
>> I don't think that's needed; the maintainer will let you know if that's
>> desirable or that they will add it (back) when committing.
>
> The problem is then remembering to manually collect the tags from a
> previous series.
>
> For my reference, it was
> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
>
> So hopefully I'll remember now :-) and there is no need for a resend
> at this time.
Is more needed to get this patch accepted? If so, can I help with that?
Cheers,
Diederik
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists