[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250812165345.000002a4@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:53:45 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@...ik.com>
CC: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "Pengutronix
Kernel Team" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"upstream@...ts.phytec.de" <upstream@...ts.phytec.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: imx93_adc: load calibrated values even
calibration failed
On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:45:48 +0200
Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@...ik.com> wrote:
> Hi Haibo,
>
> On 12. 08. 25 10:04, Haibo Chen wrote:
> > ADC calibration might fail because of the noise on reference voltage.
> > To avoid calibration fail, need to meet the following requirement:
> > ADC reference voltage Noise < 1.8V * 1/2^ENOB
> >
> > For the case which the ADC reference voltage on board do not meet
> > the requirement, still load the calibrated values, so ADC can also
> > work but maybe not that accurate.
>
> Reviewed-by: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@...ik.com>
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
> BR,
> Primoz
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c
> > index 8471737ac04a2bac0417a6397f20865f6a2c01ca..17b0a2548b0a3614ac537b01e28bc3144d17d6fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/imx93_adc.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR6 0x118
> > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR7 0x11C
> > #define IMX93_ADC_CALSTAT 0x39C
> > +#define IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0 0x3A0
> >
> > /* ADC bit shift */
> > #define IMX93_ADC_MCR_MODE_MASK BIT(29)
> > @@ -58,6 +59,8 @@
> > #define IMX93_ADC_IMR_ECH_MASK BIT(0)
> > #define IMX93_ADC_PCDR_CDATA_MASK GENMASK(11, 0)
> >
> > +#define IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0_LDFAIL_MASK BIT(4)
> > +
> > /* ADC status */
> > #define IMX93_ADC_MSR_ADCSTATUS_IDLE 0
> > #define IMX93_ADC_MSR_ADCSTATUS_POWER_DOWN 1
> > @@ -145,7 +148,7 @@ static void imx93_adc_config_ad_clk(struct imx93_adc *adc)
> >
> > static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc)
> > {
> > - u32 mcr, msr;
> > + u32 mcr, msr, calcfg;
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* make sure ADC in power down mode */
> > @@ -158,6 +161,11 @@ static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc)
> >
> > imx93_adc_power_up(adc);
> >
> > + /* Enable loading of calibrated values even in fail condition */
> > + calcfg = readl(adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0);
> > + calcfg |= IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0_LDFAIL_MASK;
> > + writel(calcfg, adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_CALCFG0);
> > +
> > /*
> > * TODO: we use the default TSAMP/NRSMPL/AVGEN in MCR,
> > * can add the setting of these bit if need in future.
> > @@ -180,9 +188,13 @@ static int imx93_adc_calibration(struct imx93_adc *adc)
> > /* check whether calbration is success or not */
> > msr = readl(adc->regs + IMX93_ADC_MSR);
> > if (msr & IMX93_ADC_MSR_CALFAIL_MASK) {
> > + /*
> > + * Only give warning here, this means the noise of the
> > + * reference voltage do not meet the requirement:
> > + * ADC reference voltage Noise < 1.8V * 1/2^ENOB
> > + * And the resault of ADC is not that accurate.
result
If nothing else comes up I'll probably just fix that whilst applying.
Jonathan
> > + */
> > dev_warn(adc->dev, "ADC calibration failed!\n");
> > - imx93_adc_power_down(adc);
> > - return -EAGAIN;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists