linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Relax sanity check of the ECDT ID string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e610854-d84c-4a59-9f83-422eafb40d6e@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 18:54:39 +0200
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ilya K <me@...ti.me>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, lenb@...nel.org,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Relax sanity check of the ECDT ID string

Am 12.08.25 um 18:40 schrieb Greg KH:

> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:51:10PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
>> On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
> <formletter>
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree.  Please read:
>      https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
>
> </formletter>

Agree.

AFAIK the Fixes: tag should be enough to ensure that this patch gets included
in the affected stable kernels.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf