linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Relax sanity check of the ECDT ID string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iNYh5=0e+rdDPOfSMNH1P=g+NWWHa28ajf4_Mr6e26VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 20:38:56 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ilya K <me@...ti.me>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Relax sanity check of the ECDT ID string

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 7:57 PM Ilya K <me@...ti.me> wrote:
>
> On 2025-08-12 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint,
> > Fixes: will not do it.)
> >
>
> I might be missing something, but doesn't that just tell you to CC stable@?
> Or do you have to specifically have the CC on the initial patch submission, not anywhere in the thread?

A Cc: stable in a patch (or elsewhere in the thread following it) is
just a hint for the maintainer anyway.

But no worries, I've added Cc: stable to the commit.