[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <084a70f2-96ef-43a1-a1d0-863496c4547e@arnaud-lcm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 20:32:11 +0100
From: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@...aud-lcm.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, eddyz87@...il.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, sdf@...ichev.me,
song@...nel.org, syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in
bpf_get_stack()
Thanks Yonghong for your feedbacks and your patience !
On 12/08/2025 05:39, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 8/9/25 5:09 AM, Arnaud Lecomte wrote:
>> A new helper function stack_map_calculate_max_depth() that
>> computes the max depth for a stackmap.
>
> Please add 'bpf-next' in the subject like [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2]
> so CI can properly test the patch set.
>
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Removed the checking 'map_size % map_elem_size' from
>> stack_map_calculate_max_depth
>> - Changed stack_map_calculate_max_depth params name to be more generic
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@...aud-lcm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 3615c06b7dfa..532447606532 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,27 @@ static inline int stack_map_data_size(struct
>> bpf_map *map)
>> sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id) : sizeof(u64);
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * stack_map_calculate_max_depth - Calculate maximum allowed stack
>> trace depth
>> + * @map_size: Size of the buffer/map value in bytes
>
> let us rename 'map_size' to 'size' since the size represents size of
> buffer or map, not just for map.
>
>> + * @elem_size: Size of each stack trace element
>> + * @flags: BPF stack trace flags (BPF_F_USER_STACK,
>> BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID, ...)
>> + *
>> + * Return: Maximum number of stack trace entries that can be safely
>> stored
>> + */
>> +static u32 stack_map_calculate_max_depth(u32 map_size, u32
>> elem_size, u64 flags)
>
> map_size -> size
> Also, you can replace 'flags' to 'skip', so below 'u32 skip = flags &
> BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK'
> is not necessary.
>
>> +{
>> + u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
>> + u32 max_depth;
>> +
>> + max_depth = map_size / elem_size;
>> + max_depth += skip;
>> + if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
>> + return sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>> +
>> + return max_depth;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int prealloc_elems_and_freelist(struct bpf_stack_map *smap)
>> {
>> u64 elem_size = sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket) +
>> @@ -406,7 +427,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> struct task_struct *task,
>> struct perf_callchain_entry *trace_in,
>> void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags, bool may_fault)
>> {
>> - u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, num_elem, max_depth;
>> + u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, max_depth;
>> bool user_build_id = flags & BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID;
>> bool crosstask = task && task != current;
>> u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
>> @@ -438,10 +459,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs
>> *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>> goto clear;
>> }
>> - num_elem = size / elem_size;
>> - max_depth = num_elem + skip;
>> - if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
>> - max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>> + max_depth = stack_map_calculate_max_depth(size, elem_size, flags);
>> if (may_fault)
>> rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
>> @@ -461,7 +479,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> struct task_struct *task,
>> }
>> trace_nr = trace->nr - skip;
>> - trace_nr = (trace_nr <= num_elem) ? trace_nr : num_elem;
>> + trace_nr = min(trace_nr, max_depth - skip);
>> copy_len = trace_nr * elem_size;
>> ips = trace->ip + skip;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists