[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b16979c4-47cf-4a9f-8f67-30f784933c05@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 22:29:13 +0100
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, vdonnefort@...gle.com, ke.wang@...soc.com,
xuewen.yan94@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/feec: Simplify the traversal of pd'cpus
On 8/12/25 10:33, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> Now we use for_each_cpu() to traversal all pd's cpus,
> it is in order to compute the pd_cap. This approach may
> result in some unnecessary judgments.
> We can simply calculate pd_cap as follows:
>
> pd_cap = cpu_actual_cap * cpumask_weight(pd_cpus);
>
> Then we can AND pd'scpus, sd's cpus and task's cpus_ptr
> before traversing, which can save some unnecessary judgment.
IMO this would be clearer if it's:
Calculate pd_cap as follows:
...
instead of traversing ...
Other than that LGTM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b173a059315c..e47fe94d6889 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8330,18 +8330,12 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> cpu_actual_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
>
> eenv.cpu_cap = cpu_actual_cap;
> - eenv.pd_cap = 0;
> + eenv.pd_cap = cpu_actual_cap * cpumask_weight(cpus);
>
> - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> -
> - eenv.pd_cap += cpu_actual_cap;
> -
> - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
> - continue;
> + cpumask_and(cpus, cpus, sched_domain_span(sd));
>
> - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
> - continue;
> + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpus, p->cpus_ptr) {
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
> util = cpu_util(cpu, p, cpu, 0);
> cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists