[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2623ee0c-b967-44c1-a9d4-4ca7dd9929df@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:26:30 +0800
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, K Prateek Nayak
<kprateek.nayak@....com>, "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Juri Lelli
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, "Steven
Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Libo Chen
<libo.chen@...cle.com>, Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, "Hillf
Danton" <hdanton@...a.com>, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Jianyong Wu" <jianyong.wu@...look.com>, Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@...il.com>, Vern Hao <vernhao@...cent.com>, Len
Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Aubrey Li
<aubrey.li@...el.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>, Chen Yu
<yu.chen.surf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] sched: Cache aware load-balancing
Hi,
On 8/12/2025 9:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> [ 18.146207][ T63] RIP: 0010:_find_next_bit (kbuild/src/consumer/lib/find_bit.c:156 (discriminator 2))
> [ 18.146207][ T63] task_cache_work (kbuild/src/consumer/include/linux/find.h:71 (discriminator 2)
> kbuild/src/consumer/kernel/sched/fair.c:1325 (discriminator 2))
This should have been fixed in the second patch:
02/28 ("sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling")that the LLC
sched domain could be NULL and we should skip the
NULL LLC sched domain.
It might be more applicable to test with the whole patch set.
As this is a RFC version and we will create a formal one with
the fixes integrated into the 01/28 patch, after the issues
have been addressed.
thanks,
Chenyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists