[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250811210158.3241454a858582a7600e62e6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 21:01:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Pedro Falcato
<pfalcato@...e.de>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Mike Rapoport
<rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko
<mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.17 0/3] mm/mremap: allow multi-VMA move for huge
folio, find ineligible earlier
On Sun, 3 Aug 2025 12:11:20 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 6.17 0/3] mm/mremap: allow multi-VMA move for huge folio, find ineligible earlier
I missed this series until just now, because the Subject: innovation
fooled me.
My pattern recognizer saw "[PATCH 6.17 ..." and said "that's an LTS
patch". Because that's precisely what they do. By the million.
I can't say I find this change valuable, really.
Now wondering which other patches I missed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists