linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e81bbfd-1688-46bd-bf38-252fed3b1c82@cock.li>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 04:17:07 -0300
From: asdx <asdx52@...k.li>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...l.net>, admin@...inas.su,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, list-bcachefs@...lthompson.net,
 malte.schroeder@...ip.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17


On 8/12/25 4:04 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 03:52:39AM -0300, asdx wrote:
>> On 8/11/25 11:26 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 12:51:11PM +0300, Konstantin Shelekhin wrote:
>>>>>    Yes, this is accurate. I've been getting entirely too many emails from Linus about
>>>>> how pissed off everyone is, completely absent of details - or anything engineering
>>>>> related, for that matter.
>>>> That's because this is not an engineering problem, it's a communication problem. You just piss
>>>> people off for no good reason. Then people get tired of dealing with you and now we're here,
>>>> with Linus thinking about `git rm -rf fs/bcachesfs`. Will your users be happy? Probably not.
>>>> Will your sponsors be happy? Probably not either. Then why are you keep doing this?
>>>>
>>>> If you really want to change the way things work go see a therapist. A competent enough doctor
>>>> probably can fix all that in a couple of months.
>>> Konstantin, please tell me what you're basing this on.
>>>
>>> The claims I've been hearing have simply lacked any kind of specifics;
>>> if there's people I'd pissed off for no reason, I would've been happy to
>>> apologize, but I'm not aware of the incidences you're claiming - not
>>> within a year or more; I have made real efforts to tone things down.
>>>
>> You keep lying. How can you be so cynical? Just two days ago you were
>> complaining on #bcache about how much control Linus has over Linux and there
>> was a lot of talk about getting him removed from Linux via CoC action.
> Are you the same guy who was just posting this on Phoronix? Either
> you're trolling, or you misread something.
>
> For the record, I'm one of the more anti CoC people out there - I agree
> with the spirit of their goals, not so much the approach. I would never
> invoke them on anyone; I prefer to talk things out (and I don't mind
> getting flamed, so long as it doesn't get in the way of the work).

I read your messages well.

Linus Torvalds is way more valuable than bcachefs. Please back off.