linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] media: iris: Add support for SM8750 (VPU v3.5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <363cfc88-9664-483f-9503-9eca7c8e617c@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:59:25 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
 Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] media: iris: Add support for SM8750 (VPU v3.5)

On 12/08/2025 09:52, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>>
>> v4l2-compliance report:
>>
>> v4l2-compliance 1.26.1-5142, 64 bits, 64-bit time_t
>> v4l2-compliance SHA: 4aee01a02792 2023-12-12 21:40:38
>>
> 
> Thank you for running the v4l2 compliance tests with your patches. While
> these tests are helpful for verifying API compliance, they do not cover the
> actual functional aspects of the new SOC support being added.
> 
> Please run a decoder use-case using either v4l2-ctl or GStreamer (GST) and
> add the results in this cover letter.
You did not provide such details on your submission:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250704-iris-video-encoder-v1-0-b6ce24e273cf@quicinc.com/

so asking others of this is just unfair and unjustified obstacle. If you
have technical comments, then share. If you are just making fake
obstacles to stop some patchset then refrain from commenting.

Unless you want statement like:


All patches have been tested with v4l2-compliance, v4l2-ctl and
Gstreamer on SM8750.

Then I can give you such statement, just like you did for your patchset:

All patches have been tested with v4l2-compliance, v4l2-ctl and
Gstreamer on SM8750.

Best regards,
Krzysztof