linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] bonding: don't set oif to bond dev when getting NS target destination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aJqepGpobcDGak_C@fedora>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 01:53:40 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Wilder <wilder@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: don't set oif to bond dev when getting NS
 target destination

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:33:28AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 07:27:19 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > 	Generically, I'm wondering if test updates should be separate
> > patches from the functional changes as a general policy.
> 
> Yes, not sure if we made it a hard requirement, but I think it's our
> preference. It is the reason why we don't require cover letters for
> submissions with 2 patches.
> 
> Hangbin, please update config for bonding tests, looks like vlans 
> are not enabled there today.

Ah, yes, I forgot to update this part.

Thanks
Hangbin