linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] ext4: fix incorrect function name in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250812021709.1120716-1-liubaolin12138@163.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:17:09 +0800
From: Baolin Liu <liubaolin12138@....com>
To: tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Baolin Liu <liubaolin@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v1] ext4: fix incorrect function name in comment

From: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@...inos.cn>

The comment mentions block_write_begin(), but the actual function
called is ext4_block_write_begin().
Fix the comment to match the real function name.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@...inos.cn>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index ed54c4d0f2f9..b0e3814f8502 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3155,7 +3155,7 @@ static int ext4_da_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
 		folio_unlock(folio);
 		folio_put(folio);
 		/*
-		 * block_write_begin may have instantiated a few blocks
+		 * ext4_block_write_begin may have instantiated a few blocks
 		 * outside i_size.  Trim these off again. Don't need
 		 * i_size_read because we hold inode lock.
 		 */
-- 
2.39.2