[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250812104018.541975109@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:39:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org,
torvalds@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org,
acme@...hat.com,
kees@...nel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/15] perf: Split out mlock limit handling
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To prepare for splitting the buffer allocation out into seperate functions
for the ring buffer and the AUX buffer, split out mlock limit handling into
a helper function, which can be called from both.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250811070620.463634790@linutronix.de
---
kernel/events/core.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6927,17 +6927,49 @@ static int map_range(struct perf_buffer
return err;
}
+static bool perf_mmap_calc_limits(struct vm_area_struct *vma, long *user_extra, long *extra)
+{
+ unsigned long user_locked, user_lock_limit, locked, lock_limit;
+ struct user_struct *user = current_user();
+
+ user_lock_limit = sysctl_perf_event_mlock >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
+ /* Increase the limit linearly with more CPUs */
+ user_lock_limit *= num_online_cpus();
+
+ user_locked = atomic_long_read(&user->locked_vm);
+
+ /*
+ * sysctl_perf_event_mlock may have changed, so that
+ * user->locked_vm > user_lock_limit
+ */
+ if (user_locked > user_lock_limit)
+ user_locked = user_lock_limit;
+ user_locked += *user_extra;
+
+ if (user_locked > user_lock_limit) {
+ /*
+ * charge locked_vm until it hits user_lock_limit;
+ * charge the rest from pinned_vm
+ */
+ *extra = user_locked - user_lock_limit;
+ *user_extra -= *extra;
+ }
+
+ lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
+ lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
+ locked = atomic64_read(&vma->vm_mm->pinned_vm) + *extra;
+
+ return locked <= lock_limit || !perf_is_paranoid() || capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK);
+}
+
static int perf_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct perf_event *event = file->private_data;
- unsigned long user_locked, user_lock_limit;
struct user_struct *user = current_user();
+ unsigned long vma_size, nr_pages;
+ long user_extra = 0, extra = 0;
struct mutex *aux_mutex = NULL;
struct perf_buffer *rb = NULL;
- unsigned long locked, lock_limit;
- unsigned long vma_size;
- unsigned long nr_pages;
- long user_extra = 0, extra = 0;
int ret, flags = 0;
mapped_f mapped;
@@ -7063,38 +7093,7 @@ static int perf_mmap(struct file *file,
}
}
- user_lock_limit = sysctl_perf_event_mlock >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
-
- /*
- * Increase the limit linearly with more CPUs:
- */
- user_lock_limit *= num_online_cpus();
-
- user_locked = atomic_long_read(&user->locked_vm);
-
- /*
- * sysctl_perf_event_mlock may have changed, so that
- * user->locked_vm > user_lock_limit
- */
- if (user_locked > user_lock_limit)
- user_locked = user_lock_limit;
- user_locked += user_extra;
-
- if (user_locked > user_lock_limit) {
- /*
- * charge locked_vm until it hits user_lock_limit;
- * charge the rest from pinned_vm
- */
- extra = user_locked - user_lock_limit;
- user_extra -= extra;
- }
-
- lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
- lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
- locked = atomic64_read(&vma->vm_mm->pinned_vm) + extra;
-
- if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() &&
- !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
+ if (!perf_mmap_calc_limits(vma, &user_extra, &extra)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists