linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Initial support for Qualcomm Hamoa IOT EVK board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60f56455-69cc-4b95-b967-ebeae2d766a0@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:26:16 +0800
From: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Yingying Tang <quic_yintang@...cinc.com>,
        Shuai Zhang <quic_shuaz@...cinc.com>,
        Yongxing Mou <quic_yongmou@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Initial support for Qualcomm Hamoa IOT EVK board



On 2025-08-04 09:37, Yijie Yang wrote:
> Introduce the device tree, DT bindings, and driver modifications required
> to bring up the HAMOA-IOT-EVK evaluation board—based on the X1E80100 SoC—to
> a UART shell.
> This patch set focuses on two key hardware components: the HAMOA-IOT-SOM
> and the HAMOA-IOT-EVK carrier board.
> The HAMOA-IOT-SOM is a compact System on Module that integrates the SoC,
> GPIOs, and PMICs. It is designed to be modular and can be paired with
> various carrier boards to support different use cases.
> The HAMOA-IOT-EVK is one such carrier board, designed for IoT scenarios.
> It provides essential peripherals such as UART, on-board PMICs, and
> USB-related components.
> Together, these components form a flexible and scalable platform, and this
> patch set enables their initial bring-up through proper device tree
> configuration and driver support.
> 
[...]

Hi Maintainers,

I’d like to check whether I should rebase my patch set onto the latest 
kernel base and submit a new version, or if it’s better to leave the 
current version as-is and wait for further review.

Please let me know what you prefer.

-- 
Best Regards,
Yijie