[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJyM3N9T4xI4Xo1G@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:02:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@...zon.com>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: pxa: fix I2C communication on Armada 3700
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> 2025. 08. 11. 22:12 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:49:54PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
...
> >> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
> >
> > I didn't get this SoB chain. Who is Imre here and what is his role in all this?
>
> Imre reviewed the patches before publishing those, but we were unsure about that
> the Reviewed-by tag can be used when it is offered privately before the
> publicaton, so we decided to use the SoB tag instead.
It's exactly what should have been done. As a such the SoB chain is confusing
(taking into account the authorship of the patches).
> It can be changed to the Rewieved-by tag if that is applicable in this case.
Please do so.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists