[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJyW_QNI8vIdr03O@codewreck.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:45:33 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dominique Martinet via B4 Relay <devnull+asmadeus.codewreck.org@...nel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@...sch.me>,
Ryan Lahfa <ryan@...fa.xyz>, Christian Theune <ct@...ingcircus.io>,
Arnout Engelen <arnout@...t.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iov_iter: iterate_folioq: fix handling of offset >=
folio size
Andy Shevchenko wrote on Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 03:39:09PM +0200:
> > I assume Andrew will pick it up eventually?
>
> I hope this to happen sooner as it broke my builds too (I always do now `make W=1`
> and suggest all developers should follow).
I actually test with W=1 too, but somehow this warning doesn't show up
in my build, I'm not quite sure why :/
(even if I try clang like the test robot... But there's plenty of
other warnings all around everywhere else, so I agree this is all way
too manual)
Anyway, sorry about it...
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists