[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB5750D8CD3471F8F191B4AA69E72AA@DM8PR11MB5750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:53:10 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "mingo@...nel.org"
<mingo@...nel.org>, "Scarlata, Vincent R" <vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, "Cai, Chong" <chongc@...gle.com>,
"Bondarevska, Nataliia" <bondarn@...gle.com>, "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, "Raynor, Scott" <scott.raynor@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 5/5] x86/sgx: Enable automatic SVN updates for SGX
enclaves
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huang, Kai <kai.huang@...el.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 2:08 PM
> To: Reshetova, Elena <elena.reshetova@...el.com>; Hansen, Dave
> <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: seanjc@...gle.com; mingo@...nel.org; Scarlata, Vincent R
> <vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>; x86@...nel.org; jarkko@...nel.org;
> Annapurve, Vishal <vannapurve@...gle.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Mallick, Asit K <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>; Aktas, Erdem
> <erdemaktas@...gle.com>; Cai, Chong <chongc@...gle.com>; Bondarevska,
> Nataliia <bondarn@...gle.com>; linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org; Raynor, Scott
> <scott.raynor@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/5] x86/sgx: Enable automatic SVN updates for SGX
> enclaves
>
> >
> > Note: while in such cases the underlying crypto assets are regenrated, it
> ^
> regenerated
>
>
Thank you for catching this! Will fix.
> [...]
>
> > +/* Mutex to ensure no concurrent EPC accesses during EUPDATESVN */
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sgx_svn_lock);
> > +
> > int sgx_inc_usage_count(void)
> > {
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&sgx_svn_lock);
> > +
> > + if (sgx_usage_count++ == 0) {
> > + ret = sgx_update_svn();
> > + if (ret)
> > + sgx_usage_count--;
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
>
> To me, I would prefer:
>
> int sgx_inc_usage_count(void)
> {
> guard(mutex)(&sgx_svn_lock);
>
> if (!sgx_usage_count) {
> int ret = sgx_update_svn();
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
> sgx_usage_count++;
>
> return 0;
> }
I can change to this version, but functionality-wise
it is equal.
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists