[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250813181300.xfpsu23arx7xy4fy@anointer>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:13:00 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
CC: <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <d-gole@...com>,
<afd@...com>, <bb@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<detheridge@...com>, <matt.coster@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2: enable the bxs-4-64
On 12:58-20250813, Randolph Sapp wrote:
> On Wed Aug 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM CDT, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 18:25-20250808, rs@...com wrote:
> >> From: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
> >>
> >> Add the relevant device tree node for Imagination's BXS-4-64 GPU.
> >>
> >> These devices uses a similar MSMC configuration to the J721S2. As such,
> >> they also require the use of the dma-coherent attribute.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
> >> ---
> >> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> >> index 7c5b0c69897d..a44ca34dda62 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
> >> @@ -2691,4 +2691,18 @@ bist_main14: bist@...0000 {
> >> bootph-pre-ram;
> >> ti,sci-dev-id = <234>;
> >> };
> >> +
> >> + gpu: gpu@...0000000 {
> >> + compatible = "ti,j721s2-gpu", "img,img-bxs-4-64", "img,img-rogue";
> >
> > Following https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/DBE4UO2RGAYX.17V1DAF8MQYJM@kernel.org/
> > Is it worth having ti,j784s4-gpu here? Are there any SoC specific quirks
> > that driver will need to handle?
>
> No SoC specific quirks, aside from those already being tracked through the
> dma-coherent attribute. If we actually want to register SoC specific
> compatibility entries as advised by the kernel docs, just let me know. I've seen
> this opinion toggle a few times.
>
Please provide bootlogs on linux-next with just this series applied.
IMHO, based on what I see at the moment on GPU, it might be a good idea
to have SoC specific compatibility entries.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
https://ti.com/opensource
Powered by blists - more mailing lists