[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b428c1f-4118-4ede-8674-eceee96036c1@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:36:24 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Paul E. McKenney"
<paulmck@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space
On 8/13/25 3:32 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13 2025 at 11:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 8/13/25 10:29 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
>>> suffered badly from the stale eventmask bits and the cleaned up version
>>> brought a whopping 25+% performance gain.
>>
>> Thanks for doing this work, it's been on my list to take a look at rseq
>> as it's quite the pig currently and enabled by default (with what I
>> assume is from a newer libc).
>
> Yes, recent glibc uses it.
>
> Could you give it a test ride to see whether this makes a difference in
> your environment?
Yep, I'll give a spin. Won't be before Monday as I'm out of town thu/fri
this week, just as a heads-up.
If I recall correct, I'd see rseq at 2-3% of overall CPU time last I
tested. I'll try and do some pre/post numbers for some of the stuff I
usually run.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists