linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix the data type inconsistency issue of min (tier, MAX_CR_TIERS-1) in read_ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250813144145.cf6eece4d1d746568c39bd86@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:41:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Qingshuang Fu <fffsqian@....com>,
 hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qingshuang Fu <fuqingshuang@...inos.cn>,
 Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes
 <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the data type inconsistency issue of min (tier,
 MAX_CR_TIERS-1) in read_ctrl_pos

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:03:42 -0700 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com> wrote:

> >
> >
> > (cc mglru maintainers, who have yet to reveal themselves in MAINTAINERS)
> 
> Sorry for that, I took a look at adding myself and Yuanchu, but it
> wasn't clear how to represent MGLRU in MAINTAINERS, because there
> isn't a mglru.c, it's bolted on to several existing files with
> existing maintainers. Should us two just be appended to the list of
> folks for vmscan.c, or?

I think a separate MGLRU section which mentions mm/vmscan.c is
appropriate.  kernel/fork.c gets a mention in three sections.