[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24714b00-cc15-4c9b-b0d4-8c76d702fcc2@nxsw.ie>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:51:51 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod.linux@...w.ie>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>, Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...aro.org>, Vedang Nagar <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Renjiang Han <quic_renjiang@...cinc.com>, Wangao Wang <quic_wangaow@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] media: iris: Allow substate transition to load resources during output streaming
On 13/08/2025 10:37, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> However, now after removing that restriction, the instance state can be
> OUTPUT_STREAMING when firmware start is triggered and substate needs to
> be moved to LOAD_RESOURCES.
>
> Fixes: 547f7b8c5090 ("media: iris: add check to allow sub states transitions")
If a restriction has been removed, has that restriction been marked as a
Fixes: ?
If not then we can't actually backport this fix as the dependency - the
restriction removal has not been marked for backport.
Please evaluate if the necessary change you have stipulated here has
been marked for backport with Fixes: and if so mention the appropriate
commit SHA in your commit log.
If you are referring to the commit immediately preceding this patch "Fix
buffer count reporting in internal buffer check" then again you should
mention that in the log so _which_ dependency you mean is clear.
If I were trying to follow this series on some kind of -stable kernel, I
don't think this commit log would reasonably tell me which depends I
need as an antecedent.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists