[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d81abdef-18fa-496d-8493-e8f336c43800@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:24:21 +1000
From: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Apurupa Pattapu <quic_apurupa@...cinc.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Harshal Dev <quic_hdev@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/11] qcomtee: enable TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC ioctl
On 8/13/2025 8:00 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8/13/25 2:35 AM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
>> Enable userspace to allocate shared memory with QTEE. Since
>> QTEE handles shared memory as object, a wrapper is implemented
>> to represent tee_shm as an object. The shared memory identifier,
>> obtained through TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC, is transferred to the driver using
>> TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF_INPUT/OUTPUT.
>>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>> Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>
>> Tested-by: Harshal Dev <quic_hdev@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> +/* Mapping information format as expected by QTEE. */
>> +struct qcomtee_mapping_info {
>> + u64 paddr;
>> + u64 len;
>> + u32 perms;
>> +} __packed;
>
> Please use types with explicit endianness, e.g. __le32. I'm assuming
> TZ will always be little-endian, regardless of the host OS
>
I'm not entirely sure how this point is relevant. As I understand it,
the core that populates this struct is the same one that accesses it in TZ.
Your argument would absolutely make sense if the host and TZ were operating
on different cores with distinct architectures -- such as one being
little-endian and the other big-endian, which is not the case.
Regards,
Amir
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists