[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176361cd-a095-4b81-9e36-f933d159d249@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:52:11 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Apurupa Pattapu <quic_apurupa@...cinc.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Harshal Dev <quic_hdev@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] firmware: qcom: scm: add support for object
invocation
On 8/13/25 11:37 PM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
>
>
> On 8/13/2025 7:53 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8/13/25 2:35 AM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
>>> Qualcomm TEE (QTEE) hosts Trusted Applications (TAs) and services in
>>> the secure world, accessed via objects. A QTEE client can invoke these
>>> objects to request services. Similarly, QTEE can request services from
>>> the nonsecure world using objects exported to the secure world.
>>>
>>> Add low-level primitives to facilitate the invocation of objects hosted
>>> in QTEE, as well as those hosted in the nonsecure world.
>>>
>>> If support for object invocation is available, the qcom_scm allocates
>>> a dedicated child platform device. The driver for this device communicates
>>> with QTEE using low-level primitives.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>> Tested-by: Harshal Dev <quic_hdev@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
[...]
>>> /**
>>> * qcom_scm_is_available() - Checks if SCM is available
>>> */
>>> @@ -2326,6 +2444,16 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> ret = qcom_scm_qseecom_init(scm);
>>> WARN(ret < 0, "failed to initialize qseecom: %d\n", ret);
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Initialize the QTEE object interface.
>>> + *
>>> + * This only represents the availability for QTEE object invocation
>>> + * and callback support. On failure, ignore the result. Any subsystem
>>> + * depending on it may fail if it tries to access this interface.
>>> + */
>>> + ret = qcom_scm_qtee_init(scm);
>>> + WARN(ret < 0, "failed to initialize qcomtee: %d\n", ret);
>>
>> This will throw a WARN on *a lot* of platforms, ranging from
>> Chromebooks running TF-A (with a reduced SMC handler), through
>> platforms requiring QCOM_SCM_SMCINVOKE_INVOKE_LEGACY (0x00) cmd
>>
>
> Are you suggesting I remove the WARN? If so, how should the user be notified?
> Should the error simply be ignored?
I suggest using dev_info/dev_notice, WARN prints multiple dozen lines
and taints the kernel
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists