[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250813044024.GA2872@neeraj.linux>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:10:24 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
Qi Xi <xiqi2@...wei.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [rcu] b41642c877: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage
Hi kernel test robot,
> #syz test
>
> >From a3cc7624264743996d2ad1295741933103a8d63b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 19:03:22 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix racy re-initialization of irq_work causing hangs
>
> RCU re-initializes the deferred QS irq work everytime before attempting
> to queue it. However there are situations where the irq work is
> attempted to be queued even though it is already queued. In that case
> re-initializing messes-up with the irq work queue that is about to be
> handled.
>
> The chances for that to happen are higher when the architecture doesn't
> support self-IPIs and irq work are then all lazy, such as with the
> following sequence:
>
> 1) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled and there is a
> grace period involving blocked tasks on the node. The irq work
> is then initialized and queued.
>
> 2) The related tasks are unblocked and the CPU quiescent state
> is reported. rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending is reset to DEFER_QS_IDLE,
> allowing the irq work to be requeued in the future (note the previous
> one hasn't fired yet).
>
> 3) A new grace period starts and the node has blocked tasks.
>
> 4) rcu_read_unlock() is called when IRQs are disabled again. The irq work
> is re-initialized (but it's queued! and its node is cleared) and
> requeued. Which means it's requeued to itself.
>
> 5) The irq work finally fires with the tick. But since it was requeued
> to itself, it loops and hangs.
>
> Fix this with initializing the irq work only once before the CPU boots.
>
> Fixes: b41642c87716 ("rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202508071303.c1134cce-lkp@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> ---
Can you please update testing results with the proposed fix?
- Neeraj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists