linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c916cf31-26cb-4ca6-a7f5-15ec471ad0c8@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 08:33:44 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
        tytso@....edu, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc
 using fio crc verifier

On 13/08/2025 08:08, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
>>> +_begin_fstest auto rw stress atomicwrites
>>> +
>>> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
>>> +_require_aiodio
>> do you require fio with a certain version somewhere?
> Oh right you mentioned that atomic=1 was broken on some older fios.

It was not broken - it just did nothing. I suppose that they are the 
same thing.

> Would you happen to know which version fixed it?

fio 3.38

thanks,
John