[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <239711fdd1eb6f79a89af7396ef7eb60f485ec12.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:17:49 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan
<rcsekar@...sung.com>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Patrik
Flykt <patrik.flykt@...ux.intel.com>, Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Varka Bhadram
<varkabhadram@...il.com>, Wu Bo <wubo.oduw@...il.com>, Markus
Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] can: m_can: fix pm_runtime and CAN state handling
On Di, 2025-08-12 at 19:36 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> The first patch fixes a pm_runtime imbalance in the m_can_platform
> driver.
>
> The rest of this series fixes the CAN state handling in the m_can
> driver:
> - add the missing state transition from from Error Warning back to
> Error Active (Patches 2+3)
> - address the fact that in some SoCs (observed on the STM32MP15) the
> M_CAN IP core keeps the CAN state and CAN error counters over an
> internal reset cycle. Set the correct CAN state during ifup and
> system resume (Patches 4+5)
> - add support for optional shared external reset, to properly reset
> the IP core (Patches 6+7)
Should this declare a dependency on
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250807-stm32mp15-m_can-add-reset-v2-1-f69ebbfced1f@pengutronix.de/
or is that already merged?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists