[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <elszhqc5knv2o4mvq2frul6vglqxsdyrjepzgmda45lmrh4ylp@qvdvsgumuigx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:39:37 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Minjong Kim <minbell.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: hid-ntrig: fix unable to handle page fault in
ntrig_report_version()
On Aug 13 2025, Minjong Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 02:46:24PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >
> > I know that mixing declarations and code is fine these days, but we
> > haven't been progressive enough to switch to that coding style in HID
> > subsystem yet :) Would you be willing to move it below the declarations?
> >
>
> From 75e52defd4b2fd138285c5ad953942e2e6cf2fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minjong Kim <minbell.kim@...sung.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:37:47 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v2] HID: hid-ntrig: fix unable to handle page fault in
> ntrig_report_version()
>
> in ntrig_report_version(), hdev parameter passed from hid_probe().
> sending descriptor to /dev/uhid can make hdev->dev.parent->parent to null
> if hdev->dev.parent->parent is null, usb_dev has
> invalid address(0xffffffffffffff58) that hid_to_usb_dev(hdev) returned
> when usb_rcvctrlpipe() use usb_dev,it trigger
> page fault error for address(0xffffffffffffff58)
>
> add null check logic to ntrig_report_version()
> before calling hid_to_usb_dev()
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjong Kim <minbell.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-ntrig.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ntrig.c b/drivers/hid/hid-ntrig.c
> index 2738ce947434..fa948d9e236c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ntrig.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ntrig.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,9 @@ static void ntrig_report_version(struct hid_device *hdev)
> struct usb_device *usb_dev = hid_to_usb_dev(hdev);
> unsigned char *data = kmalloc(8, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> + if (!hdev->dev.parent->parent)
Why simply not use if(!hid_is_usb(hdev)) instead?
Cheers,
Benjamin
> + return;
> +
> if (!data)
> goto err_free;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> I move it below the declarations.
>
> Best regards,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists