[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250813-macho-snobbish-alpaca-ff07fa@sudeepholla>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:55:48 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clocksource: Add standalone MMIO ARM arch timer
driver
+Alexandru
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> For the past 10 years, both Mark and I have been lamenting about the
> sorry state of the badly named "arch_timer" driver, and about the way
> the MMIO part is intricately weaved into the system-register part.
>
> The time has finally come to have a stab at it.
>
> This small series simply creates a new timer driver for the MMIO arch
> timer, and only that. It is an actual driver, and not some kludge that
> has to run super early (that's what the per-CPU timers are for). This
> allows, in turn, a pretty large cleanup of the per-CPU driver, though
> there is more to come -- one thing at a time.
>
> As an added bonus, we get a clocksource, which the original code
> didn't provide. Just in case it might be useful. The end-result is far
> more readable, and about 100 lines smaller.
>
(Tested it on Juno R2 and FVP in both DT and ACPI boot)
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Alexandru found it useful(avoids some unexpected hang IIUC) in his setup
based on bootwrapper which doesn't initialise MMIO timers.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists