[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025081408-swinging-endorphin-abe2@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:35:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Nir Lichtman <nir@...htman.org>,
Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Thompson <daniel@...cstar.com>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Replace deprecated strcpy() with strscpy()
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 02:03:37PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead and remove several manual
> NUL-terminations.
Manual NULL terminations are good, why get rid of that?
> Since the destination buffers 'cmd_cur' and 'cmd_hist[cmd_head]' have
> the fixed length CMD_BUFLEN, strscpy() automatically determines their
> size using sizeof() when the size argument is omitted. This makes the
> explicit size arguments for the existing strscpy() calls unnecessary,
> remove them.
But now you are dynamically calculating this?
> No functional changes intended.
How did you test this? Many of these types of changes are wrong, so you
really really need to prove it is correct.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> index 7a4d2d4689a5..ea7dc2540e40 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> @@ -727,14 +727,10 @@ static int kdb_defcmd(int argc, const char **argv)
> mp->help = kdb_strdup(argv[3], GFP_KDB);
> if (!mp->help)
> goto fail_help;
> - if (mp->usage[0] == '"') {
> - strcpy(mp->usage, argv[2]+1);
> - mp->usage[strlen(mp->usage)-1] = '\0';
> - }
> - if (mp->help[0] == '"') {
> - strcpy(mp->help, argv[3]+1);
> - mp->help[strlen(mp->help)-1] = '\0';
> - }
> + if (mp->usage[0] == '"')
> + strscpy(mp->usage, argv[2] + 1, strlen(argv[2]) - 1);
Now you are manually testing the length of argv[2], are you sure that's
ok?
> + if (mp->help[0] == '"')
> + strscpy(mp->help, argv[3] + 1, strlen(argv[3]) - 1);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kdb_macro->statements);
> defcmd_in_progress = true;
> @@ -860,7 +856,7 @@ static void parse_grep(const char *str)
> kdb_printf("search string too long\n");
> return;
> }
> - strcpy(kdb_grep_string, cp);
> + strscpy(kdb_grep_string, cp);
If this was just a search/replace, it would have been done already, so
why is this ok?
> kdb_grepping_flag++;
> return;
> }
> @@ -1076,12 +1072,12 @@ static int handle_ctrl_cmd(char *cmd)
> if (cmdptr != cmd_tail)
> cmdptr = (cmdptr + KDB_CMD_HISTORY_COUNT - 1) %
> KDB_CMD_HISTORY_COUNT;
> - strscpy(cmd_cur, cmd_hist[cmdptr], CMD_BUFLEN);
> + strscpy(cmd_cur, cmd_hist[cmdptr]);
Same here. And other places...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists