lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJ1M883eMiVCtoaO@mail.minyard.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 21:41:55 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the ipmi tree

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:42:14AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the devicetree tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):

I think by normal rules this belongs in my tree.  I'm not sure how it
got into the devicetree tree without my ack.  Or maybe the rules around
device tree are different.

I'm fine with it either place, though.

-corey

> 
>   84e7845761c7 ("dt-bindings: ipmi: aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc: Add missing "clocks" property")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   a2f5472f1cbe ("dt-bindings: ipmi: aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc: Add missing "clocks" property")
> 
> in the devicetree tree.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ