[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025081424-spectacle-chevron-6be1@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:58:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: atomisp: Use vmemdup_user() instead of open-coding
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 03:42:33PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Use vmemdup_user() to get a copy of the user buffer in
> > atomisp_v4l2_framebuffer_to_css_frame().
>
> Was an information source (like the following) reused here?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16/source/scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup_user.cocci#L2
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists