[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05cc39e7-9ec1-4ac1-903d-873f77c3c79d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:40:38 +0200
From: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: introduce DDR4
Hi Julius,
On 30/07/2025 20:29, Julius Werner wrote:
>> +title: DDR3 SDRAM compliant to JEDEC JESD79-4D
>
> Should this say DDR4?
Yes, absolutely.
>
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + ddr {
>> + compatible = "ddr4-ff,f", "jedec,ddr4";
>
> This is not a valid example for the way you're defining it now anymore.
Yes will fix it.
Best regards,
Clément
Powered by blists - more mailing lists