[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1cc499b-403e-4dcf-9e6a-10d4d43a8b30@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:51:13 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add BD7910[0,1,2,3]
On 8/14/25 4:57 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 11:35, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> The ROHM BD79100, BD79101, BD79102, BD79103 are very similar ADCs as the
>> ROHM BD79104. The BD79100 has only 1 channel. BD79101 has 2 channels and
>> the BD79102 has 4 channels. Both BD79103 and BD79104 have 4 channels,
Is it just a difference in max sample rate? or pinout?
>> and, based on the data sheets, they seem identical from the software
>> point-of-view.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rohm,bd79104.yaml | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rohm,bd79104.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rohm,bd79104.yaml
>> index f0a1347ba4db..6a6e6ab4aca3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rohm,bd79104.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rohm,bd79104.yaml
>> @@ -14,7 +14,16 @@ description: |
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> - const: rohm,bd79104
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
You can drop the items: here since there is only one item.
>> + - enum:
>> + - rohm,bd79100
>> + - rohm,bd79101
>> + - rohm,bd79102
>> + - rohm,bd79104
>> + - items:
>> + - const: rohm,bd79104
>> + - const: rohm,bd79103
>
> Oops. I believe the order of the compatibles is wrong for the fallback.
Indeed.
>
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>
> Yours,
> -- Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists