[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62be0896-6c90-4a27-81cb-7bd897d0e6f2@grenoble.cnrs.fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:28:57 +0200
From: Edgar Bonet <bonet@...noble.cnrs.fr>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Subject: Re: [ISSUE + PATCH] Interrupts were enabled early by spinlock guard
Hello Geert, and thanks for you prompt review!
> I think the conversions in
> drivers/irqchip/irq-atmel-aic.c:aic_irq_domain_xlate() and
> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c:liointc_set_type()
> are also wrong, and need a similar change.
The one in irq-atmel-aic.c looks indeed strikingly similar. The one in
irq-loongson-liointc.c is slightly different though. Instead of:
irq_gc_lock_irqsave() -> guard(raw_spinlock_irq)
it does:
irq_gc_lock_irqsave() -> guard(raw_spinlock)
I don't know what the implications are though.
> Unfortunately I have no hardware to verify.
Neither do I.
Regards,
Edgar.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists