linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250814155548.457172-5-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:25:46 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation

The ONE_REG handling of SBI extension enable/disable registers and
SBI extension state registers is already under SBI implementation.
On similar lines, let's move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() under SBI
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c          | 29 ++-------------------------
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c             | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
index 144c3f6d5eb9..212c31629bc8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_request_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				      unsigned long pc, unsigned long a1);
 void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_load_reset_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices);
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				   const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -87,7 +88,6 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_sbi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
 const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *kvm_vcpu_sbi_find_ext(
 				struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long extid);
-bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx);
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
index 5843b0519224..0894ab517525 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
@@ -1060,34 +1060,9 @@ static inline unsigned long num_isa_ext_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return copy_isa_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
 }
 
-static int copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
-{
-	unsigned int n = 0;
-
-	for (int i = 0; i < KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX; i++) {
-		u64 size = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) ?
-			   KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 : KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
-		u64 reg = KVM_REG_RISCV | size | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT |
-			  KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | i;
-
-		if (!riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(vcpu, i))
-			continue;
-
-		if (uindices) {
-			if (put_user(reg, uindices))
-				return -EFAULT;
-			uindices++;
-		}
-
-		n++;
-	}
-
-	return n;
-}
-
 static unsigned long num_sbi_ext_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	return copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
+	return kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(vcpu, NULL);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long num_sbi_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1215,7 +1190,7 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return ret;
 	uindices += ret;
 
-	ret = copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
+	ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(vcpu, uindices);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 	uindices += ret;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
index 8b3c393e0c83..19e0e3d7b598 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ riscv_vcpu_get_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long idx)
 	return sext;
 }
 
-bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx)
+static bool riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int idx)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_context *scontext = &vcpu->arch.sbi_context;
 	const struct kvm_riscv_sbi_extension_entry *sext;
@@ -288,6 +288,31 @@ static int riscv_vcpu_get_sbi_ext_multi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_reg_indices_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
+{
+	unsigned int n = 0;
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX; i++) {
+		u64 size = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT) ?
+			   KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 : KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
+		u64 reg = KVM_REG_RISCV | size | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT |
+			  KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | i;
+
+		if (!riscv_vcpu_supports_sbi_ext(vcpu, i))
+			continue;
+
+		if (uindices) {
+			if (put_user(reg, uindices))
+				return -EFAULT;
+			uindices++;
+		}
+
+		n++;
+	}
+
+	return n;
+}
+
 int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_sbi_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				   const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 {
-- 
2.43.0