[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be3a05c6-a016-4fdb-a3c4-d23ccd13b9c9@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:42:43 -0700
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] s390/pci: Restore airq unconditionally for the
zPCI device
On 8/14/2025 4:32 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-08-13 at 10:08 -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
>> Commit c1e18c17bda6 ("s390/pci: add zpci_set_irq()/zpci_clear_irq()"),
>> introduced the zpci_set_irq() and zpci_clear_irq(), to be used while
>> resetting a zPCI device.
>>
>> Commit da995d538d3a ("s390/pci: implement reset_slot for hotplug slot"),
>> mentions zpci_clear_irq() being called in the path for zpci_hot_reset_device().
>> But that is not the case anymore and these functions are not called
>> outside of this file.
>>
>> However after a CLP disable/enable reset (zpci_hot_reset_device),
>> the airq setup of the device will need to be restored. Since we
>> are no longer calling zpci_clear_airq() in the reset path, we should
>> restore the airq for device unconditionally.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> index 84482a921332..8b5493f0dee0 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> @@ -427,8 +427,7 @@ bool arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
>>
>> - if (!zdev->irqs_registered)
>> - zpci_set_irq(zdev);
>> + zpci_set_irq(zdev);
>> return true;
>> }
>>
> This would make zdev->irqs_registered effectively without function so
> the patch should remove that field from struct zpci_dev and
> zpci_set_irq()/zpci_clear_irq(). Alternatively you could also clear
> zdev->irqs_registed in zpci_disable_device(). I think the former is
> cleaner though.
>
> Thanks,
> Niklas
Yeah agreed, will remove the irqs_registered from zdev as its not needed
anymore.
Thanks
Farhan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists