lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHKZfL0Ypbbz2hFiDPhAhvE5F3ZyrBy6V7OpzMyOJfoZ47cLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 12:41:59 +0800
From: Huang Adrian <adrianhuang0701@...il.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	ahuang12@...ovo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pidfs: Fix memory leak in pidfd_info()

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 9:22 PM Adrian Huang (Lenovo)
<adrianhuang0701@...il.com> wrote:
>
> After running the program 'ioctl_pidfd03' of Linux Test Project (LTP) or
> the program 'pidfd_info_test' in 'tools/testing/selftests/pidfd' of the
> kernel source, kmemleak reports the following memory leaks:
>
>   # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>   unreferenced object 0xff110020e5988000 (size 8216):
>     comm "ioctl_pidfd03", pid 10853, jiffies 4294800031
>     hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>       02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .@..............
>       00 00 00 00 af 01 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>     backtrace (crc 69483047):
>       kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x2fb/0x410
>       copy_process+0x178/0x1740
>       kernel_clone+0x99/0x3b0
>       __do_sys_clone3+0xbe/0x100
>       do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0
>       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>   ...
>   unreferenced object 0xff11002097b70000 (size 8216):
>   comm "pidfd_info_test", pid 11840, jiffies 4294889165
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     06 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .@..............
>     00 00 00 00 b5 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>   backtrace (crc a6286bb7):
>     kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x2fb/0x410
>     copy_process+0x178/0x1740
>     kernel_clone+0x99/0x3b0
>     __do_sys_clone3+0xbe/0x100
>     do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0
>     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>   ...
>
> The leak occurs because pidfd_info() obtains a task_struct via
> get_pid_task() but never calls put_task_struct() to drop the reference,
> leaving task->usage unbalanced.
>
> Fix the issue by adding __free(put_task) to the local variable 'task',
> ensuring that put_task_struct() is automatically invoked when the
> variable goes out of scope.
>
> Fixes: 7477d7dce48a ("pidfs: allow to retrieve exit information")
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang (Lenovo) <adrianhuang0701@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/pidfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pidfs.c b/fs/pidfs.c
> index edc35522d75c..857eb27c3d94 100644
> --- a/fs/pidfs.c
> +++ b/fs/pidfs.c
> @@ -296,12 +296,12 @@ static __u32 pidfs_coredump_mask(unsigned long mm_flags)
>  static long pidfd_info(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
>         struct pidfd_info __user *uinfo = (struct pidfd_info __user *)arg;
> +       struct task_struct *task __free(put_task);

Oops, forgot to assign NULL. This causes the regression (general
protection fault) for the error path in pidfd_info() when running the
program 'ioctl_pidfd05' of Linux Test Project (LTP).

Please ignore this patch, and I'll send a v2 shortly.

>         struct pid *pid = pidfd_pid(file);
>         size_t usize = _IOC_SIZE(cmd);
>         struct pidfd_info kinfo = {};
>         struct pidfs_exit_info *exit_info;
>         struct user_namespace *user_ns;
> -       struct task_struct *task;
>         struct pidfs_attr *attr;
>         const struct cred *c;
>         __u64 mask;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ