lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0942c623-626e-43f5-90f8-552adc8d00dc@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:57:53 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] docs: Move the "features" tools to tools/doc



On 8/13/25 10:56 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:42:42 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> escreveu:
> 
>> On 8/13/25 4:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:32:00 -0600
>>> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
>>>   
>>>> The scripts for managing the features docs are found in three different
>>>> directories; unite them all under tools/doc and update references as
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/sphinx/kernel_feat.py                           | 4 ++--
>>>>  .../features/scripts => tools/doc}/features-refresh.sh        | 0
>>>>  {scripts => tools/doc}/get_feat.pl                            | 2 +-  
>>>
>>> This one is the next on my list to convert to Python, but I didn't
>>> do any changes on it yet.  
>>
>> Just curious, why does it need to be converted from shell to Python?
>> I'm sure you will explain that in the patch description (or cover letter).
> 
> The rationale is the same as kernel-doc and get-abi: there is a Sphinx
> extension that executes it. By converting it into Python and splitting
> the code into an exec and a library, we can use the library directly at
> the extension.
> 
> Besides that, the code in Python, specially after using modules and 
> classes, become IMO clearer, making easier to maintain, specially if
> we avoid functions inside functions, complex class inheritance, lamba
> functions and multiple statements on a single line.

Thank you for that.

-- 
~Randy


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ