[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c660ea69-d111-4a81-85c6-8ab16dfcfb28@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 12:24:04 +0530
From: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<todor.too@...il.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] media: qcom: camss: enable csid 690 for qcs8300
On 8/14/2025 3:03 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 13/08/2025 06:37, Vikram Sharma wrote:
>> The CSID in qcs8300 is version 690, it is same as csid used in
>> lemans(sa8775p). csid gen3 have support for csid 690.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-gen3.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-gen3.c
>> b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-gen3.c
>> index fc6a9787febe..664245cf6eb0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-gen3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-gen3.c
>> @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@
>> #define CSID_CSI2_RX_IRQ_CLEAR 0xA4
>> #define CSID_CSI2_RX_IRQ_SET 0xA8
>> -#define IS_CSID_690(csid) (csid->camss->res->version == CAMSS_8775P)
>> +#define IS_CSID_690(csid) ((csid->camss->res->version == CAMSS_8775P) \
>> + || (csid->camss->res->version == CAMSS_8300))
>> #define CSID_BUF_DONE_IRQ_STATUS 0x8C
>> #define BUF_DONE_IRQ_STATUS_RDI_OFFSET (csid_is_lite(csid) ?\
>> 1 : (IS_CSID_690(csid) ?\
>
> This really feels like it should be a property of the CSID not of the
> SoC but... anyway it'll do for now.
Hi Bryan,
Thanks for your review. I will address this in a follow up series
marking dependency on this one.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Regards,
Vikram
Powered by blists - more mailing lists