linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] media: iris: Allow substate transition to load resources during output streaming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4f05871-0229-8ac6-d2c3-b0dd71a9aa57@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:20:46 +0530
From: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bod.linux@...w.ie>,
        Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar
	<abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil
	<hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...aro.org>,
        "Vedang
 Nagar" <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Renjiang Han <quic_renjiang@...cinc.com>,
        Wangao Wang <quic_wangaow@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] media: iris: Allow substate transition to load
 resources during output streaming



On 8/14/2025 11:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 00:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8/13/25 11:51 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 13/08/2025 10:37, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>>>> However, now after removing that restriction, the instance state can be
>>>> OUTPUT_STREAMING when firmware start is triggered and substate needs to
>>>> be moved to LOAD_RESOURCES.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 547f7b8c5090 ("media: iris: add check to allow sub states transitions")
>>>
>>> If a restriction has been removed, has that restriction been marked as a 
>>> Fixes: ?
>>>
>>> If not then we can't actually backport this fix as the dependency - the 
>>> restriction removal has not been marked for backport.
>>
>> Please stop confusing fixes and backports..
>>
>> If you're really paranoid about this commit getting autoselected, see
>> 'noautosel' under this section:
>>
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1
> 
> Commit still needs to explain what is the bug, what is observable issue
> being fixed here. Lack of feature is not a bug.

Ok, will add more info.

Regards,
Dikshita
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof