[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJ2bWqQCMtjT3NZh@fedora>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:16:26 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, yukuai3@...wei.com, bvanassche@....org,
nilay@...ux.ibm.com, hare@...e.de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] blk-mq-sched: add new parameter nr_requests in
blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags()
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:35:07AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> This helper only support to iallocate the default number of requests,
> add a new parameter to support specific number of requests.
>
> Prepare to fix tags double free problem if nr_requests is grown by
> queue sysfs attribute nr_requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 11 +++++++----
> block/blk-mq-sched.h | 2 +-
> block/elevator.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index e2ce4a28e6c9..9a8a0b5e04a9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *et_table,
> }
>
> struct elevator_tags *blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> - unsigned int nr_hw_queues)
> + unsigned int nr_hw_queues, unsigned int nr_requests)
> {
> unsigned int nr_tags;
> int i;
> @@ -475,8 +475,11 @@ struct elevator_tags *blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> * 128, since we don't split into sync/async like the old code
> * did. Additionally, this is a per-hw queue depth.
> */
> - et->nr_requests = 2 * min_t(unsigned int, set->queue_depth,
> - BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
> + if (nr_requests)
> + et->nr_requests = nr_requests;
> + else
> + et->nr_requests = 2 * min_t(unsigned int, set->queue_depth,
> + BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
It looks more readable to add helper blk_mq_default_nr_requests(),
and pass it from call sites directly, then people won't be confused
with the passed zero `nr_requests`.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists