[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083A9FDABF6F33456CD14A4FC34A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:47:17 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu
<fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej"
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, "Chen,
Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring
> I think this series is close to being ready to pass to the x86 maintainers.
> To that end I focused a lot on the changelogs with the goal to meet the
> tip requirements that mostly involved switching to imperative tone. I do not
> expect that I found all the cases though (and I may also have made some mistakes
> in my suggested text!) so please ensure the changelogs are in imperative tone
> and uses consistent terms throughout the series.
>
> If you disagree with any feedback or if any of the feedback is unclear please
> let us discuss before you spin a new version. Of course it is not required
> that you follow all feedback but if you don't I would like to learn why.
>
> Please note that I will be offline next week.
Reinette,
I took one fast pass through all your comments. I think they all
look good (and I believe I understand each one). Thanks for all
the suggestions.
I'll try to keep (better) notes on what I change as I work through
each patch so I'll have a summary of any areas that I'm unsure
about for you to read when you get back before I post v9.
Enjoy your time away.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists