[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJ+OXcxBiLtZxRJF@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:45:33 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.clark@....qualcomm.com" <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
"yong.wu@...iatek.com" <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and
iommu_dev_reset_done()
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:14:28AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:59 AM
> >
> [...]
> > However, if there is a domain attachment/replacement happening during an
> > ongoing reset, ATS routines may be re-activated between the two function
> > calls. So, introduce a new pending_reset flag in group_device to defer an
> > attachment during a reset, allowing iommu core to cache target domains in
> > the SW level while bypassing the driver. The iommu_dev_reset_done() will
> > re-attach these soft-attached domains, once the device reset is finished.
>
> attach could fail e.g. when device and domain are incompatible. This
> deferred attach (until reset done) makes compatibility check impossible in
> the resetting window, given the driver attach_dev callback is not called
> in the normal attach path.
>
> Worse..
Ah, that's a good point! I missed that one..
> > + /* Shift RID domain back to group->domain */
> > + if (group->domain != group->blocking_domain)
> > + WARN_ON(__iommu_attach_device(group->domain, dev));
>
> ..means that an user could trigger WARN_ON() easily if he knows an attach
> would fail.
>
> IMHO we may just fail attach request in the resetting window then
> WARN_ON above makes sense as it's shifting back to a domain which was
> originally attached to the resetting device.
>
> Not sure any valid case where one would want to attach/replace domain
> for a resetting device...
It would feel odd to me, if that could happen. So, failing it with
-EBUSY sounds plausible to me.
Thanks!
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists