[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250815-30ccdcf30a9746a3b2443b4b@orel>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:14:36 -0500
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for
SBI FWFT
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 09:25:44PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The SBI FWFT feature values must be reset upon VCPU reset so
> introduce feature specific reset callback for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> index 164a01288b0a..5a3bad0f9330 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_fwft.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature {
> */
> bool (*supported)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> + /**
> + * @reset: Reset the feature value irrespective whether feature is supported or not
> + *
> + * This callback is mandatory
> + */
> + void (*reset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> /**
> * @set: Set the feature value
> *
> @@ -75,6 +82,13 @@ static bool kvm_sbi_fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return misaligned_traps_can_delegate();
> }
>
> +static void kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_misaligned_delegation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu_config *cfg = &vcpu->arch.cfg;
> +
> + cfg->hedeleg &= ~MIS_DELEG;
> +}
> +
> static long kvm_sbi_fwft_set_misaligned_delegation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft_config *conf,
> unsigned long value)
> @@ -124,6 +138,11 @@ static bool kvm_sbi_fwft_pointer_masking_pmlen_supported(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return fwft->have_vs_pmlen_7 || fwft->have_vs_pmlen_16;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_pointer_masking_pmlen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + vcpu->arch.cfg.henvcfg &= ~ENVCFG_PMM;
> +}
> +
> static long kvm_sbi_fwft_set_pointer_masking_pmlen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft_config *conf,
> unsigned long value)
> @@ -180,6 +199,7 @@ static const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature features[] = {
> {
> .id = SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG,
> .supported = kvm_sbi_fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported,
> + .reset = kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_misaligned_delegation,
> .set = kvm_sbi_fwft_set_misaligned_delegation,
> .get = kvm_sbi_fwft_get_misaligned_delegation,
> },
> @@ -187,6 +207,7 @@ static const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature features[] = {
> {
> .id = SBI_FWFT_POINTER_MASKING_PMLEN,
> .supported = kvm_sbi_fwft_pointer_masking_pmlen_supported,
> + .reset = kvm_sbi_fwft_reset_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> .set = kvm_sbi_fwft_set_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> .get = kvm_sbi_fwft_get_pointer_masking_pmlen,
> },
> @@ -321,11 +342,16 @@ static void kvm_sbi_ext_fwft_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void kvm_sbi_ext_fwft_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - int i;
> struct kvm_sbi_fwft *fwft = vcpu_to_fwft(vcpu);
> + const struct kvm_sbi_fwft_feature *feature;
> + int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(features); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(features); i++) {
> fwft->configs[i].flags = 0;
> + feature = &features[i];
> + if (feature->reset)
> + feature->reset(vcpu);
> + }
> }
>
> const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_fwft = {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists