linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: simplify lowmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5b381aa-33a2-4537-9f71-a95f621441a7@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 09:59:04 +0800
From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@...ux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>,
 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
 Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: simplify lowmem_reserve max calculation



在 2025/8/14 22:07, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 05:00:52PM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
>> From: Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>
>>
>> Use max() macro to simplify the calculation of maximum lowmem_reserve
>> value in calculate_totalreserve_pages(), instead of open-coding the
>> comparison. The functionality remains identical.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>
> 
> You can remove the {} from the for block as well now.

I agree to delete it, but I noticed a patch has been added to the -mm 
mm-new branch by Andrew Morton[1]. What should I do now? Send v2 ? 
Or send a new patch? If this is my first time, please feel free to give me some advice.
[1]：https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815004917.03FD7C4CEED@smtp.kernel.org/
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

-- 
Thanks,
Ye Liu