[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GxJs03EcMt0jm-x_fDuy_RtCrnOmyJvVVgAP9O9R6E2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:42:06 +0900
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
richardcochran@...il.com, guangjie.song@...iatek.com,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, Nícolas F . R . A . Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/27] clk: mediatek: clk-gate: Refactor
mtk_clk_register_gate to use mtk_gate struct
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 10:55 PM Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> MT8196 uses a HW voter for gate enable/disable control, with
> set/clr/sta registers located in a separate regmap. Refactor
> mtk_clk_register_gate() to take a struct mtk_gate instead of individual
> parameters, avoiding the need to add three extra arguments to support
> HW voter register offsets.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.c | 35 ++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.c
> index 67d9e741c5e7..0375ccad4be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.c
> @@ -152,12 +152,9 @@ const struct clk_ops mtk_clk_gate_ops_no_setclr_inv = {
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_gate_ops_no_setclr_inv);
>
> -static struct clk_hw *mtk_clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> - const char *parent_name,
> - struct regmap *regmap, int set_ofs,
> - int clr_ofs, int sta_ofs, u8 bit,
> - const struct clk_ops *ops,
> - unsigned long flags)
> +static struct clk_hw *mtk_clk_register_gate(struct device *dev,
> + const struct mtk_gate *gate,
> + struct regmap *regmap)
> {
> struct mtk_clk_gate *cg;
> int ret;
> @@ -167,17 +164,17 @@ static struct clk_hw *mtk_clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name
> if (!cg)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - init.name = name;
> - init.flags = flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> - init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL;
> - init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0;
> - init.ops = ops;
> + init.name = gate->name;
> + init.flags = gate->flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> + init.parent_names = gate->parent_name ? &gate->parent_name : NULL;
> + init.num_parents = gate->parent_name ? 1 : 0;
> + init.ops = gate->ops;
>
> cg->regmap = regmap;
> - cg->set_ofs = set_ofs;
> - cg->clr_ofs = clr_ofs;
> - cg->sta_ofs = sta_ofs;
> - cg->bit = bit;
> + cg->set_ofs = gate->regs->set_ofs;
> + cg->clr_ofs = gate->regs->clr_ofs;
> + cg->sta_ofs = gate->regs->sta_ofs;
> + cg->bit = gate->shift;
I'd rather see |struct mtk_clk_gate| (the runtime data) gain a pointer
to the static data |struct mtk_gate| instead of doing all the copying.
This is just needless duplication.
ChenYu
> cg->hw.init = &init;
>
> @@ -228,13 +225,7 @@ int mtk_clk_register_gates(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
> continue;
> }
>
> - hw = mtk_clk_register_gate(dev, gate->name, gate->parent_name,
> - regmap,
> - gate->regs->set_ofs,
> - gate->regs->clr_ofs,
> - gate->regs->sta_ofs,
> - gate->shift, gate->ops,
> - gate->flags);
> + hw = mtk_clk_register_gate(dev, gate, regmap);
>
> if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> pr_err("Failed to register clk %s: %pe\n", gate->name,
> --
> 2.39.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists