[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276092A811C3FA85B1667C88C34A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:27:17 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "robin.clark@....qualcomm.com"
<robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, "yong.wu@...iatek.com"
<yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach
> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 1:10 PM
>
> On 8/12/25 06:59, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > + * This is called on the dma mapping fast path so avoid locking. This is
> > + * racy, but we have an expectation that the driver will setup its
> DMAs
>
> Why not making it like this,
>
> int iommu_deferred_attach(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain
> *domain)
> {
> /* Caller must be a probed driver on dev */
> if (!dev->iommu_group)
> return 0;
>
> guard(mutex)(&dev->iommu_group->mutex);
> if (!dev->iommu->attach_deferred)
> return 0;
>
> return __iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
> }
>
As the comment said it's the fast path so avoid locking. your way
implies that every map call needs to acquire the group mutex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists